"Sometimes you have to lose yourself before you can find anything."
-- "Lewis" in Deliverance (1972)
Over my vacation, I caught the movie Deliverance: I thought it would be a good movie to see after a long hiking trip in the mountains. For those of you unfamiliar with the movie, it chronicles a canoe trip that goes awry with four middle-aged guys through the deep South. Of course, when I first saw it the notion of middle-aged was a foreign concept to me. (I don't want to go further on this thought, believe me!)
The line spoken by Burt Reynolds early in the film is a good touchstone for what we are going through with the Internet, Microsoft, and the future of the web. Many of us are still trying to find where the web is going, and I am not just talking about typing in the right terms in Google. And I do think you have to go down quite a few blind alleys or backwaters or whatever the right geographical metaphor is before you can understand the right direction you want to be heading towards.
For those of you that were on vacation like me, Microsoft has made some minor noises about eliminating the browser icon from subsequent versions of Windows. But this isn't really much more than an empty gesture: at this juncture, browsing technology is firmly embedded so deeply into Windows that you couldn't remove it without crashing your system. And anyway, who would want to? We all use Internet Explorer anyway, and have learned to live with its quirks (Active X) and oddities (a space in a URL brings up an error, a space in the same window when I am browsing my hard disk is acceptable). Who cares about Netscape's browser? It is so Novell, so 1994. You might as well bring back DOS.
But Netscape has been transformed into what is now called AOL Time Warner, and it is a formidable competitor to Microsoft. Oddly, while there are some people who work for this company that are still creating browser software, the heart and soul of the company has almost nothing to do with simple HTML and web browsing. Microsoft and AOL are fighting a far more difficult battle, the battle for content, for what we will watch and be entertained by. This is the holy grail for the future of the Internet. Everything that matters goes beyond plain text pages and a few cute tricks like boldface and blue underlined links. It is about renting videos, going to the movies, watching the Sopranos and West Wing, sending IMs and playing games. Here is the where the real money is. Here is where we spend most of our time (as sad as I am to admit it). Here is where we are truly passionate about our gear: I may know the clock speed of my Pentium, but the screen size of my TV is in another league entirely.
So what has Microsoft done, and what are planning? Take a look at the following, and see if you can determine a trend:
Taken together, this represents a far more dangerous monopoly than a mere browser inside the operating system Trojan Horse could ever be. Microsoft is after all of our entertainment technologies. It is an assault on so many fronts that it is easy to lose track.
In 1993, convergence between computing and the entertainment industries was a big deal. I wrote a column for Infoworld entitled, "Why convergence won't happen," and ended it by saying:
"Corporate networks will be safe from Nintendo-attached nodes for a long time, rest easy. But let's call a spade a spade: the coming covergence will be less animated spreadsheets and more animated entertainment. Time Warner, Spielberg, and others will benefit. AT&T and Microsoft won't."
Now I am not so sure. And like Lewis, I think we all have to get a little lost first.
To subscribe, send a blank email to
To be removed from this list, send a blank email to
+1 (516) 944-3407
entire contents copyright 2001 by David Strom, Inc.
Web Informant is ® registered trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
ISSN #1524-6353 registered with U.S. Library of Congress.